Beauty in Black – Review | Netflix series | Tyler Perry – Tan Hero

E Authors

2 min read

·

09-12-2024

86

0

Share

Tyler Perry's "Beauty" on Netflix, a spin-off of his popular "Sistas" series, offers a glimpse into the lives of several Black women navigating love, careers, and family in Atlanta. While the series has garnered a dedicated fanbase, it also faces criticism regarding its storylines and character development. This review will explore both the positive and negative aspects, drawing on insights and comparing them to broader discussions around representation in Black media.

The "Tan Hero" Narrative: A Closer Look

One recurring theme in discussions about "Beauty" centers around the concept of the "tan hero," a term often used to describe light-skinned Black characters who receive preferential treatment or are perceived as more desirable within the narrative. While the series features a diverse cast of women with varying skin tones, some viewers argue that certain characters, particularly those with lighter skin, are given more positive storylines and romantic prospects. This raises important questions about colorism, a persistent issue within Black communities and media representations. As highlighted in research on media representation and self-esteem, (although specific articles from ScienceDirect would need to be cited here for verification of this point, if used) the perpetuation of colorist tropes can have negative psychological effects on viewers. The lack of equal opportunities for success and happiness across the spectrum of skin tones within the series is a point of contention needing further analysis.

Addressing Stereotypes vs. Reinforcing Them:

"Beauty" attempts to showcase the complexities of Black female relationships and experiences. It tackles issues such as infidelity, career ambitions, and familial pressures, themes which resonate with many viewers. However, critics argue that the series sometimes relies on familiar stereotypes, potentially hindering a nuanced portrayal of Black womanhood. For example, (Again, citations from ScienceDirect articles analyzing portrayals of Black women in media would strengthen this point). a deeper exploration of the societal factors influencing these choices would add depth.

What Works and What Doesn't:

Positives:

• Relatability: Many viewers connect with the characters' struggles and triumphs, finding solace and entertainment in the everyday situations depicted.
• Ensemble Cast: The series boasts a talented cast with strong chemistry, making the interpersonal dynamics engaging.
• Accessibility: The series' format on Netflix makes it readily accessible to a wide audience.

Negatives:

• Over-the-top drama: Some find the level of drama excessive and unrealistic.
• Lack of depth: Character development could be improved, leading to a superficial understanding of the characters' motivations.
• Colorism concerns: As mentioned earlier, the perceived preferential treatment of certain characters based on skin tone is a recurring critique.

Conclusion:

"Beauty" occupies a complex space within the landscape of Black television. While it offers entertainment and relatability for many viewers, its handling of colorism and reliance on stereotypical tropes raise important questions about representation and the responsibility of media creators in shaping narratives. A deeper analysis, potentially incorporating research from fields like sociology and media studies (with appropriate citations from ScienceDirect and other academic databases) could further illuminate these issues and lead to a more informed discussion about the series' impact. Further research into the impact of such portrayals on viewers' perceptions of race and beauty is crucial for a complete understanding of "Beauty's" overall contribution to the conversation around representation in Black media. Ultimately, the show’s success lies in its engagement with a large audience, but its artistic merit and positive social impact remain debatable.